Schwalbe Marathon E-Plus 700x35C Addix E-50 tire, wire

Variant Schwalbe Marathon E-Plus 700x38C Addix E-50 plášť, drôt

The jacket as such is OK, that is, it met expectations, it is too early for an objective evaluation, it has not been tested yet. I chose it because of its above-average load capacity.
Putting it on was really smooth and easy, after wetting the sides with soapy water, they also sat centrally.
Size 40-622 has an actual rim width of 38mm with an internal width of 19mm (measured at 4.5bar pressure).
They barely fit under the relatively narrow fenders, while I still had 40-622 tires (Kellys Elevation reflex, they had an actual width of approx. 36mm), I had to fight a lot with that (shorten the fender bolt, center the wheel more perfectly in general, etc.) , it was a battle with tenths of a millimeter, so this surprised me unpleasantly, if I had known this in advance, I would probably have chosen other tires even at the cost of lower protection against punctures).
The weight is massive, the bike is noticeably now about 1kg heavier with the new tyres, but I was aware of that.
(PS: I put on the stripped Kellys Elevation tires about 2 years ago to replace the original original over 10 year old bike tires (Kellys). The original over 10 year old ones showed absolutely no defects, I replaced them purely as a precaution. The new ones But the 2-year-old Elevations completely cracked on the sides after the first year, they had to go in the trash, now they looked really dangerous. So I expect these 4x more expensive (!) Schwalbe tires to last at least 10 years...)

Variant Schwalbe Marathon E-Plus 700x38C Addix E-50 plášť, drôt

zena spokojna

Variant Schwalbe Marathon E-Plus 700x38C Addix E-50 plášť, drôt

Spoľahlivé

Variant Schwalbe Marathon E-Plus 700x38C Addix E-50 plášť, drôt

I wanted to try these tires as a replacement mainly for the legendary Marathon Plus, but also for the Marathon Plus Tour with a more aggressive pattern.
I basically didn't notice any difference compared to Marathon Plus.
Just out of curiosity, I looked at Bicycle Rolling Resistance and the E-Marathon is a little heavier than the classic Marathon Plus and should have a little better protection against punctures, although there is not much difference in protection. There is already a bigger difference in the resistance, and together with the higher weight, you "do" significantly more.

But as a jacket for e-bikes, in the city, for occasional trips or long hikes, it's a good jacket. I haven't received a defect yet, I just have to take into account the weight. However, it remains to be seen whether E-Marathon has as long a life as Marathon Plus.

However, if I had to choose again, I would rather choose the classic Marathon Plus, which is a bit lighter, has lower resistance and has almost identical protection against defects. In addition, it is a jacket that has been proven over the years, not only by long-distance cyclists.
And I think that the classic Marathon with green guard protection (predecessor of Marathon Plus) will perhaps be an even better choice. It has a slightly weaker protection than the Marathon Plus, but the protection is still at an excellent level. However, it is even lighter and has even less resistance, which will definitely be useful on longer routes.
But a hundred people, a hundred tastes. ?